Individual features Launch system — due to application of propulsion with static thrust compensating the weight of the airframe the aerial vehicle can be hand? The possibility to control the system independently from two separate Light Ground Control Stations GCS — for example an operator of the UAV and a commanding officer Advanced systems to enhance flight safety — including anti-spin system, anti -icing system protecting the Prandtl tube Automatic flight escorting — with mobile transceiver station Portable and compact — no need for sophisticated antenna system, while ensuring very good ranges also in built-up areas Main operational features — Possibility to pre-define the flight route and modify the flight route in-flight.
GS4 Check the details More. Warmate R Check the details More. Frequency Hopping is also available to provide a. Check the details. This set provides a secure attachment and a possibility for. PolCam Back Office The software continuously monitors the status of each connected device. A user can see each device location on the map and check device temperature, operating voltage, power failure, angles change,.
The suite includes 15 draft standard test methods for evaluating small initial emphasis on vertical take-off and landing systems and small hand launched fixed wing systems.
For the VTOL systems, testing and practice starts within netted aviaries indoors and outdoors to avoid issues of flying in the national airspace. The test methods measure essential capabilities of robots and operator proficiency for hazardous missions defined by emergency responders and soldiers.
It should serve as an extension of the operator to improve remote situational awareness and provide means to project operator intent through the equipped capabilities. It should also improve effectiveness of the mission while reducing risk to the operator.
Key features include:. Standard test methods are simply agreed upon ways to objectively measure robot capabilities. They isolate certain robot requirements and enable repeatable testing.
They are developed and validated through a consensus process with equal representation of users, developers, and test administrators. The resulting robot capabilities data captured within standard test methods can be directly compared even when the tests are performed at different sites at different times.
Each standard test method includes the following elements:. Such equipment standards are typically intended to improve compatibility, enable interoperability, increase production, lower costs, etc. This can be important for many reasons, but can also hinder innovation. In this effort, we are not proposing to develop a standard sUAS specification of any kind. Rather, we are proposing to develop standard test methods that can be used to evaluate and compare entire classes of such systems in objective and quantifiable ways.
The resulting suite of standard test methods could indeed be used to specify a standard sUAS at some point, similar to how they are used to specify purchases. But that is left to each user community to define for themselves based on their particular mission objectives. We use standard test methods to encourage implementation of new technologies to improve capabilities and measure progress along the way.
NIST is leading an international effort to develop the measurements and standards infrastructure necessary to evaluate and compare robotic capabilities for emergency responders and military organizations. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
UAS Pilot Training. Learn More. Aerial Photography. Aerial photography provides more angles from which creators can capture the world.
0コメント